www.DobraDieta.pl
Forum dyskusyjne serwisu www.DobraDieta.pl

Medycyna konwencjonalna - (Nie) rzetelność medycznych prac naukowych

Witold Jarmolowicz - Śro Sie 15, 2018 09:35
Temat postu: (Nie) rzetelność medycznych prac naukowych
Cytat:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih....cles/PMC2322947
Does pharmaceutical advertising affect journal publication about dietary supplements?
Czy reklamowanie lekarstw w medycznych żurnalach wpływa na publikowanie negatywnych ocen suplementów?
Dietary supplements-DS

Results
Journals' total pages per issue ranged from 56 to 217 while advertising pages ranged from 4 to 88; pharmaceutical advertisements (pharmads) accounted for 1.5% to 76% of ad pages. Journals with the most pharmads published significantly fewer major articles about DS per issue than journals with the fewest pharmads (P < 0.01). Journals with the most pharmads published no clinical trials or cohort studies about DS. The percentage of major articles concluding that DS were unsafe was 4% in journals with fewest and 67% among those with the most pharmads (P = 0.02). The percentage of articles concluding that DS were ineffective was 50% higher among journals with more than among those with fewer pharmads (P = 0.4).

Conclusion
These data are consistent with the hypothesis that increased pharmaceutical advertising is associated with publishing fewer articles about DS and publishing more articles with conclusions that DS are unsafe. Additional research is needed to test alternative hypotheses for these findings in a larger sample of more diverse journals.


Konkluzja
Te dane potwierdzają hipotezę, że zwiększanie reklam lekarstw jest skojarzone ze zmniejszaniem artykułów o suplementach diety i publikowaniem większej ilości artykułów o niebezpieczeństwach suplementacji.
Howgh!
JW


Powered by phpBB modified by Przemo © 2003 phpBB Group